spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COGGSHALL, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by COGGSHALL, J. C.
Journal of Experimental Biology 57,401-413 (1972)
Published by Company of Biologists 1972


The Landing Response and Visual Processing in the Milkweed Bug, Oncopeltus Fasciatus

JOHN C. COGGSHALL 1

1 Department of Neurosciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California; Max-Planck-Institut für biologische Kybernetik, Spemannstrasse 38, D 7400 Tübingen, Germany

1. The landing response of the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus consists primarily of extension at one leg joint (femur-tibia) of each of the front four legs upon presentation of the appropriate visual stimulus.

2. Small-field peripherally directed angular motion in the frontal visual hemisphere is sufficient to elicit the landing response.

3. Movement from the periphery is not an effective stimulus.

4. Response latency to a large-field peripherally moving striped pattern decreases monotonically with increasing angular velocity.

5. This decrease is consistent with what is known of the dynamics of motiondetecting neurones in other insects.

6. It is suggested that motor mechanisms controlling the landing response, optomotor turning reactions and flight-power behaviour receive inputs from a common neural motion-detection system.







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1972