spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MORIN, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by COOKE, I. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MORIN, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by COOKE, I. M.
Journal of Experimental Biology 54,723-735 (1971)
Published by Company of Biologists 1971


Behavioural Physiology of the Colonial Hydroid Obelia : III. Characteristics of the Bioluminescent System

JAMES G. MORIN 1 and IAN M. COOKE 2

1 Biological Laboratories, Harvard University Cambridge, Mass., 02138; Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024
2 Biological Laboratories, Harvard University Cambridge, Mass., 02138; Laboratoire de Neurophysiologie Cellulaire, 4, Avenue Gordon-Bennett, Paris 6° France

1. The bioluminescent system of Obelia responds to stimulation by producing a burst of excitatory potentials (luminescent potentials, LPs) with each stimulus except the first. These LPs initiate flashes from the coupled luminescent effectors.

2. There is temporal facilitation between the applied stimulus and the LP-system; the LP-system shows adaptation to stimulation by a rise in threshold as well as fatigue.

3. There is facilitation within the LP-system that is temporal at a given point and spatial (in the distance of spread) between two or more points. The result is a limited spread of the first potentials and decreasing numbers of potentials with increasing distance but often a through-conduction of the final potentials.

4. The conduction velocity of the LPs is about22 cm/s at 12 °C; the refractory period is about 60 ms at 20 °C and 150 ms at 12 °C; the latency from stimulation to the first LP in a stimulus train first decreases from 130-600 ms to 20-80 ms and then increases again to 150-600 ms at 20 °C. The latency between LP and the flash is about 20±9 ms.

5. The intervals between LPs in bursts evoked by stimuli applied at 1/s gradually increase from about 65 ms to about 135 ms at 20 °C. The absolute LP intervals are temperature-dependent (the relative ratios are not) but independent of the stimulus frequency. The number of LPs in a burst is frequency dependent.

6. The facilitation curve of the LP-system-luminescent effector junctions, as determined from flash intensity, shows a rapid rise between 60 and 80 ms, a fairly rapid decay between 80 and 200 ms, and a long residual decay which lasts for several hundred milliseconds.

Note:

Preliminary reports of this work have been published (Morin, Reynolds & Hastings, 1968; Morin & Reynolds, 1969)

This work was supported in part by a predoctoral Fellowship from the National Science Foundation

Submitted on October 23, 1970




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. Thorpe, G. Shelton, and M. Laverack
Colonial nervous control of lophophore retraction in cheilostome Bryozoa
Science, July 4, 1975; 189(4196): 60 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1971