spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DELCOMYN, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DELCOMYN, F.
Journal of Experimental Biology 54,453-469 (1971)
Published by Company of Biologists 1971


The Effect of Limb Amputation on Locomotion in the Cockroach Periplaneta Americana

FRED DELCOMYN 1

1 Department of Biology, University of Oregon, and Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow

1. The effects of amputating parts of legs on walking in the cockroach Periplaneta americana were studied with the aid of high-speed motion pictures.

2. Amputation of one or two legs at the femoro-tibial joint, leaving the femur to touch the ground and thus provide support during walking, had very little effect on the timing of movements of ipsilateral or contralateral leg pairs, so that gait was constant at nearly all speeds of locomotion. The cycle of forward (protraction) and rearward (retraction) movements of individual legs was also little affected by the amputations.

3. Amputation of combinations of two legs at the trochantero-femoral joint, leaving the animal without the support of the amputated legs, had no effect on the timing of movements of contralateral leg pairs, but had a strong effect on timing between ipsilateral ones, such that gait changed as a function of the speed of locomotion. Except for a general depression in most cases, the ratio of protraction to retraction for each leg at any given walking speed was unchanged.

4. On the basis of these results it is suggested that the timing of leg movements is strongly influenced by feedback from peripheral receptors, while the cycle of protraction and retraction in each leg is largely under central control. A model of this control based on sinusoidal activation and inhibition of muscles of protraction and retraction is presented and discussed.

Submitted on September 8, 1970




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. A. Fleming and P. W. Bateman
Just drop it and run: the effect of limb autotomy on running distance and locomotion energetics of field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus)
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2007; 210(8): 1446 - 1454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
F Delcomyn
Neural basis of rhythmic behavior in animals
Science, October 31, 1980; 210(4469): 492 - 498.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1971