QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by TEN KATE, J. H. Articles by KUIPER, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by TEN KATE, J. H. Articles by KUIPER, J. W.

Journal of Experimental Biology 53,501-514 (1970)
Published by Company of Biologists 1970

The Dimensions and Sensitivities of Semicircular Canals

J. H. TEN KATE ¹, H. H. VAN BARNEVELD ¹, and J. W. KUIPER ¹

¹ Department for Biophysics, Natuurkundig Laboratorium der Rijksuniversiteit, Groningen, Netherlands

1. The dimensions of the semicircular canals of pike can be expressed as allometric functions of the body length L.

2. The equal sensitivity of pike of different sizes to rotatory stimulation can be explained as a quadratic bending of the cupula.

3. In the pike the sensitivity is of the same order of magnitude for the vertical and horizontal semicircular canals.

4. In the pike the growth rate of the volumes of duct and ampulla is the same for the horizontal semicircular canal and for the posterior semicircular canal.

5. The special growth rate of the dimensions of the horizontal semicircular canal of the ray can be explained by a quadratic bending of the cupula.

6. For equally large cupulae the sensitivity of the horizontal semicircular canal is of the same order of magnitude for twenty-three mammals, fourteen birds and one reptile as it is for the pike.

7. Within the limits of error the ‘growth rate’ of the diameter of the narrow duct is the same in mammals as in the pike.

8. At the same body mass the absolute value of the diameter of the narrow duct is smaller in mammals than in the pike by a factor of 1.69.

9. For a body mass of 1 kg the value of the enclosed area of the horizontal semicircular canal is 6 times smaller in mammals than in pike.

10. The model of the overcritically damped oscillator for the semicircular canal remains valid during growth if a quadratic bending of the cupula is assumed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Yang and T. E. Hullar Relationship of Semicircular Canal Size to Vestibular-Nerve Afferent Sensitivity in Mammals J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3197 - 3205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Fitzpatrick and B. L. Day Probing the human vestibular system with galvanic stimulation J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2004; 96(6): 2301 - 2316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]