spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PEARSON, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by MALHOTRA, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PEARSON, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by MALHOTRA, S. K.
Journal of Experimental Biology 53,299-316 (1970)
Published by Company of Biologists 1970


Properties of Action Potentials from Insect Motor Nerve Fibres

K. G. PEARSON 1, R. B. STEIN 1, and S. K. MALHOTRA 1

1 Department of Physiology and Biological Sciences Electron Microscopy Laboratory, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

1. The properties of nerve action potentials in small insect motor nerves were studied using extracellular recording electrodes.

2. A length of nerve was lifted out of solution and recordings were made with respect to the solution either from an intact nerve (triphasic recording) or from near a cut end of the nerve (monophasic recording).

3. In a cockroach nerve, the number of spontaneously active fibres was small enough that corresponding nerve fibres could be identified in each preparation by their action potential amplitude and their pattern of activity. Under controlled conditions, the absolute amplitudes of either monophasic or triphasic records were reproducible and could be used to calculate fibre diameter. The calculations were confirmed from histological sections of the nerve.

4. Conduction velocity varied approximately as the 0.78 power of fibre diameter in a cockroach nerve and as 0.7 power of fibre diameter in a locust nerve. These values are considerably larger than the square root relation predicted if membrane properties are independent of fibre diameter.

5. Membrane properties probably vary with fibre diameter since the action potential duration increases dramatically for fibres below 5 µ in diameter.

6. For the cockroach nerve systematic structural differences between fibres of different sizes are also seen with the electron microscope and the relation of these to the functional differences is considered.

Submitted on April 2, 1970




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
R. M. Robertson
Modulation of Neural Circuit Operation by Prior Environmental Stress
Integr. Comp. Biol., February 1, 2004; 44(1): 21 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. R. Trimarchi and R. K. Murphey
The shaking-B2 Mutation Disrupts Electrical Synapses in a Flight Circuit in Adult Drosophila
J. Neurosci., June 15, 1997; 17(12): 4700 - 4710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
S. N. ZILL and D. T. MORAN
Suppression of Reflex Postural Tonus: A Role of Peripheral Inhibition in Insects
Science, May 14, 1982; 216(4547): 751 - 753.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
B. Mulloney and A. Selverston
Antidromic Action Potentials Fail to Demonstrate Known Interactions between Neurons
Science, July 7, 1972; 177(4043): 69 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1970