spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TUCKER, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by PARROTT, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by TUCKER, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by PARROTT, G. C.
Journal of Experimental Biology 52,345-367 (1970)
Published by Company of Biologists 1970


Aerodynamics of Gliding Flight in a Falcon and Other Birds

VANCE A. TUCKER 1 and G. CHRISTIAN PARROTT 1

1 Department of Zoology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

1. A live laggar falcon (Falco jugger) glided in a wind tunnel at speeds between 6.6 and 15.9 m./sec. The bird had a maximum lift to drag ratio (L/D) of 10 at a speed of 12.5 m./sec. As the falcon increased its air speed at a given glide angle, it reduced its wing span, wing area and lift coefficient.

2. A model aircraft with about the same wingspan as the falcon had a maximum L/D value of 10.

3. Published measurements of the aerodynamic characteristics of gliding birds are summarized by presenting them in a diagram showing air speed, sinking speed and L/D values. Data for a high-performance sailplane are included. The soaring birds had maximum L/D values near 10, or about one quarter that of the sailplane. The birds glided more slowly than the sailplane and had about the same sinking speed.

4. The ‘equivalent parasite area’ method used by aircraft designers to estimate parasite drag was modified for use with gliding birds, and empirical data are presented to provide a means of predicting the gliding performance of a bird in the absence of wind-tunnel tests.

5. The birds in this study had conventional values for parasite drag. Technical errors seem responsible for published claims of unusually low parasite drag values in a vulture.

6. The falcon adjusted its wing span in flight to achieve nearly the maximum possible L/D value over its range of gliding speeds.

7. The maximum terminal speed of the falcon in a vertical dive is estimated to be 100 m./sec.

Submitted on September 26, 1969




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. T. Wilkinson
Sailing the skies: the improbable aeronautical success of the pterosaurs
J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2007; 210(10): 1663 - 1671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. G. McCAY
AERODYNAMIC STABILITY AND MANEUVERABILITY OF THE GLIDING FROG POLYPEDATES DENNYSI
J. Exp. Biol., March 10, 2002; 204(16): 2817 - 2826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M Rosen and A Hedenstrom
Gliding flight in a jackdaw: a wind tunnel study
J. Exp. Biol., January 3, 2001; 204(6): 1153 - 1166.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
V. Tucker
Gliding flight: drag and torque of a hawk and a falcon with straight and turned heads, and a lower value for the parasite drag coefficient
J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 2000; 203(24): 3733 - 3744.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. A. Etnier and S. Vogel
Reorientation of daffodil(Narcissus: Amaryllidaceae) flowers inwind: drag reduction andtorsional flexibility
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2000; 87(1): 29 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1970