spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ENGER, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by SZABO, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ENGER, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by SZABO, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Experimental Biology 51,339-345 (1969)
Published by Company of Biologists 1969


Sound Reception in the Brazilian Cicada Fidicina Rana Walk

PER S. ENGER 1, DAVID J. AIDLEY 2, and THOMAS SZABO 3

1 Institute of Physiology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
2 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich
3 Centre d'Etudes de Physiologie Nerveuse, 4 Avenue Gordon-Bennett, Paris 16E

1. Sound reception in the Brazilian cicada Fidicina rana has been studied by recording the electrical activity in the auditory nerve in response to various sound stimuli.

2. The highest sensitivity to pure tones is in the frequency range of 6-9 kHz. A considerable and rapid adaptation occurs.

3. The response to trains of clicks consists of a series of compound action potentials. At repetition rates above 100/sec. this response also shows adaptation.

4. The response to the natural continuous song of the cicada is not very different from the response to trains of artificially produced clicks. In the two other types of natural song the adaptation of the auditory response is circumvented. Thus the response to the ‘zeep’ call (during which the intensity of consecutive clicks increases) consists of a series of compound action potentials of about the same amplitude, and the response to the distress call consists of a 8hort burst of action potentials for each burst of clicks. It is suggested that these songs therefore constitute very effective methods of intraspecific signalling.

Note:

This study was supported by the R.V. Alpha Helix Amazon Expedition 1967.

Submitted on January 14, 1969


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Sueur, J. F. C. Windmill, and D. Robert
Tuning the drum: the mechanical basis for frequency discrimination in a Mediterranean cicada
J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2006; 209(20): 4115 - 4128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1969