spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MORGAN, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MORGAN, E.
Journal of Experimental Biology 50,501-513 (1969)
Published by Company of Biologists 1969


The Responses of Nephtys (Polychaeta: Annelida) to Changes in Hydrostatic Pressure

ELFED MORGAN 1

1 Department of Zoology and Comparative Physiology, University of Birmingham

1. An increase in pressure elicited swimming in Nephtys, the number of worms induced to swim being related to the amplitude of the pressure change within the range of stimuli investigated. A decrease in pressure inhibited swimming.

2. The latency of the response to both an increase and a decrease also appears to be related to the magnitude of the stimulus, the worms responding more rapidly to the bigger pressure changes.

3. Brief pulses of pressure lasting 1 sec. elicited neither increase nor decrease in the level of swimming, but pulses of 5 sec. duration induced some individuals to swim. Releasing the pressure at the end of the 5 sec. period resulted in a decrease in the swimming activity below the pre-stimulus level. It is suggested that the different responses may be mediated via separate receptor mechanisms.

4. Phase-angle analysis of the responses to cyclical changes in pressure suggested that the worms were responding primarily to the rate of change of pressure, but the response did not appear to be a simple sine-function of the stimulus. The worms also seemed to be responding in part to some component occurring at twice the basic cycle.

Submitted on July 17, 1968







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1969