spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FRASER ROWELL, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FRASER ROWELL, C. H.
Journal of Experimental Biology 50,191-201 (1969)
Published by Company of Biologists 1969


Central Control of an Insect Segmental Reflex : II. Analysis of the Inhibitory Input from the Metathoracic Ganglion

C. H. FRASER ROWELL 1

1 Zoology Department, Makerere College, Uganda, University of E. Africa; Zoology Dept., University of California, Berkeley, Calif., USA.

1. The prothoracic grooming reflex of the locust is normally inhibited by the rest of the C.N.S. This paper examines the effect of removing the most powerful inhibitory source, the metathoracic ganglion, on the signal flow in and out of the prothoracic ganglion.

2. Removal of the metathoracic ganglion decreases the number of action potentials entering the prothoracic ganglion; the number of action potentials leaving the prothoracic ganglion increases. Since the recording samples only about 1% of the axons in the connective, mainly large ones, and since the sample is probably different in different preparations, it is concluded that removal of the input from the metathoracic ganglion causes a general disinhibition of the prothoracic ganglion.

3. Inhibition of the grooming reflex is probably due to this general inhibition of the ganglion, not to a specific inhibitory connexion with the metathoracic ganglion. It is suggested that the total input to the ganglion may, apart from its specific functions, contribute to a non-specific inhibition, possibly via a ganglionic arousal system.

Submitted on June 24, 1968







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1969