QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by CRONLY-DILLON, J. Articles by SHARMA, S. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by CRONLY-DILLON, J. Articles by SHARMA, S. C.

Journal of Experimental Biology 49,679-687 (1968)
Published by Company of Biologists 1968

Effect of Season and Sex on the Photopic Spectral Sensitivity of the Three-Spined Stickleback

JOHN CRONLY-DILLON ¹ and SANSAR C. SHARMA ²

¹ M.R.C. Research Group on Vision, Department of Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Scotland; Department of Physiology, University of Manchester
² M.R.C. Research Group on Vision, Department of Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Scotland; Department of Biology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.

1. The photopic spectral sensitivity of the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus was obtained behaviourally using the optomotor response as the index of sensitivity. Our experiments were designed to determine whether spectral sensitivity was affected (i) by the sex of the fish, and (ii) by season.

2. In females _max occurred at approximately 510 run. and 594 nm. In males the corresponding values were 502 nm. and 594 nm. Thus there appears to be a small but consistent difference of the order of 10 nm. between the shorter wavelength peaks of males and females.

3. In males the spectral sensitivity appears to remain virtually unchanged throughout the year. By contrast, during the summer months when reproductive activity is highest, the optomotor threshold for females at the red (594 nm.) end of the spectrum is considerably lower than the corresponding threshold value for males. This difference between the sexes disappears during winter months when reproductive activity is at a minimum.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. E. Cummings, X. E. Bernal, R. Reynaga, A. S. Rand, and M. J. Ryan Visual sensitivity to a conspicuous male cue varies by reproductive state in Physalaemus pustulosus females J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2008; 211(8): 1203 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. H. Hamdani, S. Lastein, F. Gregersen, and K. B. Doving Seasonal Variations in Olfactory Sensory Neurons--Fish Sensitivity to Sex Pheromones Explained? Chem Senses, February 1, 2008; 33(2): 119 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]