spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WELLS, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by YOUNG, J. Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by WELLS, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by YOUNG, J. Z.
Journal of Experimental Biology 49,401-412 (1968)
Published by Company of Biologists 1968


Changes in Textural preferences in Octopus After Lesions

M. J. WELLS 1 and J. Z. YOUNG 1

1 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, and the Department of Anatomy, University College London

1. Octopuses repeatedly tested at alternate trials with rough and smooth spheres, presented without reward take more of the smooth than the rough spheres. The individuals that take most often show the greatest preference.

2. The overall tendency to take decreases within each session of sixteen trials and recovers by the next session some hours later.

3. There is a slight decrease in mean takes over the first few sessions but the level then remains at about 36% over ten sessions of sixteen trials.

4. Animals without vertical lobes tested in the same way without rewards take more often (at 60% of all trials).

5. As with the normals there is a decline in take within each session; Extinction is therefore not exclusively the result of changes in the vertical lobe.

6. The preference for smooth is less marked in animals without the vertical lobes than in normals.

7. Animals with the supraoesophageal lobes split by a vertical cut (‘half-brain animals’) and animals with the supraoesophageal lobes removed except for the buccal and ventral subfrontal take fewer objects than normal octopuses.

8. The same animals show reduction or reversal of the smooth preference manifest in normal octopuses.

9. Removal of the whole of the inferior frontal system produced animals that take more often than normal, at 63% of all trials. These octopuses showed a marked preference for smooth. The system for release of objects is defective in these animals and this may act to give the appearance of excesss of takes of smooth.

10. The fact that bund but otherwise normal octopuses prefer smooth objects was confirmed in a discrimination training experiment. Normal animals trained with a smooth sphere as positive performed better initially than those trained in the other direction, though the asymptote reached was the same for both.

11. Animals without vertical lobes showed in training about the same preference for smooth as normals but were variable. They learned more slowly than normals.

12. Half-brain animals showed a strong preference for rough in training. The animals trained with smooth positive learned very slowly and had not reached the level of those trained with rough positive after 160 trials.

Submitted on March 28, 1968







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1968