QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BURROWS, M. Articles by HORRIDGE, G. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by BURROWS, M. Articles by HORRIDGE, G. A.

Journal of Experimental Biology 49,223-250 (1968)
Published by Company of Biologists 1968

The Action of the Eyecup Muscles of the Crab, Carcinus, During Optokinetic Movements

M. BURROWS ¹ and G. A. HORRIDGE ²

¹ Gatty Marine Laboratory and Department of Natural History University of St Andrews; Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon. 97403 U.S.A.
² Gatty Marine Laboratory and Department of Natural History University of St Andrews

1. The actions of the nine eyecup muscles of the crab during horizontal optokinetic movements are described.

2. Each muscle includes a wide spectrum of fibre types, ranging from phasic, with sarcomere lengths of 3-4 µm., through intermediate, to tonic fibres with sarcomeres of 10-12 µm. Each muscle receives at least one slow and one fast motoneuron, but no inhibitory supply. The slow axons predominantly innervate the tonic muscle fibres while the fast axons innervate the phasic ones.

3. Slow movement and the position of the eyecup in space are controlled by the frequency of slow motoneuron discharges. All muscles collaborate at every position. The phasic system is recruited during rapid eyecup movements of large amplitude.

4. In optokinetic nystagmus the exact form of the impulse sequences are described for each muscle. They are the consequence of a visually driven central programme which takes no account of the movement which it generates. Movements in opposite directions involve different central programmes; the one is not merely the reverse of the other. There is no effective proprioceptive feedback from the eyecup joint or from muscle tension receptors.