spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HORN, G.
Right arrow Articles by ROWELL, C. H. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by HORN, G.
Right arrow Articles by ROWELL, C. H. F.
Journal of Experimental Biology 49,143-169 (1968)
Published by Company of Biologists 1968


Medium and Long-term Changes in the Behaviour of Visual Neurones in the Tritocerebrum of Locusts

G. HORN 1 and C. H. FRASER ROWELL 1

1 Department of Anatomy, University of Cambridge and Department of Zoology, Makerere University College, Uganda

1. Extracellular recordings were made from single units in the tritocerebrum of locusts. The units responded to objects moved anywhere in the contralateral visual field. They were relatively insensitive to stationary stimuli and did not respond to auditory or tactile stimulation.

2. Responses to successive movements gradually declined even when an interval of several minutes elapsed between each movement. The number of impulses evoked by a stimulus was strongly influenced by the amount and timing of previous stimulation. Such influences occasionally lasted for several hours.

3. The responses of some cells to the first few groups of stimuli presented at the beginning of an experiment were non-decremental, but the response to subsequent stimulation was always decremental.

4. Many of the units showed directional preferences, discharging more vigorously to movement in one direction than in the reverse direction. In no case was movement inhibitory to the cell.

5. The directional preferences were modified by primacy so that for a number of presentations a unit responded preferentially to the directional characteristics of the first of a group of stimuli.

6. The cells were insensitive to movement of the whole visual field brought about by movement of the whole animal, but still retained their responsiveness to relative movement within the visual field.

Submitted on March 1, 1968




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. R. Gray
Habituated visual neurons in locusts remain sensitive to novel looming objects
J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2005; 208(13): 2515 - 2532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Matheson, S. M. Rogers, and H. G. Krapp
Plasticity in the Visual System Is Correlated With a Change in Lifestyle of Solitarious and Gregarious Locusts
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 1 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
G. Horn, S. P. R. Rose, and P. P. G. Bateson
Experience and Plasticity in the Central Nervous System
Science, August 10, 1973; 181(4099): 506 - 514.
[PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
B. Bridgeman
Visual Receptive Fields Sensitive to Absolute and Relative Motion during Tracking
Science, December 8, 1972; 178(4065): 1106 - 1108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. Bruner and D. Kennedy
Habituation: Occurrence at a Neuromuscular Junction
Science, July 3, 1970; 169(3940): 92 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1968