spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VOLPE, P.
Right arrow Articles by DI LORENZO, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VOLPE, P.
Right arrow Articles by DI LORENZO, M.
Journal of Experimental Biology 47,297-305 (1967)
Published by Company of Biologists 1967


Extraretinal Pigmentation and Colour Discrimination : I. Choice of Colour of Substrate During Oviposition in Drosophila Melanogaster

P. VOLPE 1, M. CARFAGNA 2, and M. DI LORENZO 2

1 Istituto di Biologia Generale e Genetica dell'Università, Naples, Italy; International Laboratory of Genetics and Biophysics, Naples, Italy
2 Istituto di Biologia Generale e Genetica dell'Università, Naples, Italy

1. The hypothesis that the choice of substrate colour for oviposition may vary preferentially according to the type of eye pigment has been confirmed by experiments on three phenotypes of D. melanogaster, the normal or wild type, the vermilion mutant, having no homochrome, and the brown mutant, lacking pteridine.

2. The results can be summarized thus: (a) no preferential selection on the part of the wild phenotype; (b) unambiguous preference by vermilion for blue, a preference less clearly marked for yellow, with green rejected; and (c) clear preference by the brown mutant for green, with rejection of blue.

3. Choice of colour during oviposition was found to be different from that expressed by phototactic response to certain monochromatic lights, as reported some years ago.

4. The probable biological significance of such behaviour in functions which are physiologically distinct is also discussed.

Submitted on April 19, 1967







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1967