QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BRADY, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by BRADY, J.

Journal of Experimental Biology 47,153-163 (1967)
Published by Company of Biologists 1967

Control of the Circadian Rhythm of Activity in the Cockroach : I. The Role of the Corpora Cardiaca, Brain and Stress

JOHN BRADY ¹

¹ Zoological Laboratoy, Downing Street, Cambridge; Houghton Poultry Research Station, Houghton, Huntingdon, U.K.

1. Harker has reported (1960) that the locomotor rhythm in the cockroach is maintained only if a secretion from the corpora cardiaca is delivered to the sub-oesophageal ganglion via the pair of small nerves connecting these two organs. Roberts has counter-claimed (1966) that neither this nerve nor the corpora cardiaca themselves are concerned in the control of the rhythm.

2. It has been possible to confirm Roberts's findings that these nerves can be severed, and much (possibly all) of the corpora cardiaca removed, without affecting the periodicity of the rhythm.

3. Brief periods of enforced activity are shown to increase peak activity in the rhythm, whereas stress in the form of minor wounding depresses it.

4. Cockroaches are found to maintain rhythmicity after the almost complete elimination of the medial neurosecretory cells from their brains.

5. It is suggested that the differences between the views of Harker and Roberts concerning the influence of the corpora cardiaca may be explained in terms of the type of actograph used and the possibility that a cardiacum secretion controls the amount of activity but not its periodicity.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B Rence and W Loher Arrhythmically singing crickets: thermoperiodic reentrainment after bilobectomy Science, October 24, 1975; 190(4212): 385 - 387. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Gaston and M. Menaker Pineal Function: The Biological Clock in the Sparrow? Science, June 7, 1968; 160(3832): 1125 - 1127. [Abstract] [PDF]