spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MELLON, D.
Right arrow Articles by MPITSOS, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MELLON, D., Jr
Right arrow Articles by MPITSOS, G. J.
Journal of Experimental Biology 46,585-597 (1967)
Published by Company of Biologists 1967


Response Heterogeneity in Adductor Muscle Efferents of the Surf Clam

DEFOREST MELLON Jr 1 and GEORGE J. MPITSOS 1

1 Department of Biology University of Virginia, Charlottesville, U.S.A., and Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts

1. Two populations of neurons in the visceroparietal ganglion of the surf clam have been identified as efferent to the posterior adductor muscle. Both populations are driven by input from the cerebrovisceral connectives and the posterior pallial nerves. The latter pathways originate in tactile receptors on the siphons and posterior mantle.

2. Cells designated as type I respond to input over the four major nerve roots by compound postsynaptic potentials, and to input over the adductor muscle nerves by facilitating strictly excitatory potentials. Type II neurons respond in a purely excitatory manner to input over all pathways tested. It is suggested that pharmacological analysis of the input excitatory synaptic contacts on type I cells would have implications for the structural organization of molluscan neuropile.

3. Neither efferent pathway has yet been identified in terms of functional connexions made at the periphery. It is assumed from behavioural observations that type I cells are motoneurons controlling phasic contraction of the adductor, but electro-physiological confirmation of this is still wanting.

Note:

Supported by research grants from the National Science Foundation (no. GB-3625) and the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness (no. NB-04989), United States Public Health Service.

Submitted on February 15, 1967







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1967