|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Relationships Between Photoperiodism and Circadian Rhythms of Activity in the House Finch
1 Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles, California; Department of Zoology, University of California, Davis, California
2 Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles, California; Department of Oceanography, University of California, La Jolla, California
1. The Bunning hypothesis proposes that many rhythmic physiological processes, including photoperiodic responsiveness, are all based upon a single, endogenous circadian time-measuring system (die physiologische Uhr). We have attempted to test this hypothesis by examining correlations between the circadian waking-sleeping rhythm of the house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus), and the circadian rhythm of sensitivity to light, which underlies the photoperiodic testicular responses of this species.
2. Experimental techniques included (1) comparisons of locomotor activity patterns induced by specific non-daily light cycles which stimulate gametogenesis (LD 6:30 and 6:54) with those induced by other cycles which are non-inductive (LD 6:18, 6:42 and 6:66); (2) comparisons of gametogenesis resulting from light cycles which produce large phase-lead in the activity rhythms and thereby result in photic stimulation late in the subjective day (LD 6:20 and 3:23) with results from similar cycles which cause no phase lead (LD 6:16 and 3:19); and (3) comparisons of gametogenesis under free-running (unsynchronized) conditions in which a 6 hr. stimulus was intermittently administered early in the subjective day, with other treatments in which the same stimulus was administered late in the subjective day.
3. In all experimental series, when only group responses are considered, there were clear and strong correlations between testicular growth and the patterns observed in locomotor activity. The nature of the large intra-group variability, however, convinces us that the Bünning hypothesis, as here interpreted, is inadequate to account for all the results. Either the two circadian rhythms may be independent, similar systems; or, if there is a single master clock, the two manifestations of this timing system are apparently not phase-locked under artificial laboratory conditions. It is not clear to us how these two alternatives are experimentally distinguishable.
Submitted on July 6, 1966
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Ravikumar, B. Senthilkumaran, P.D. Tewary, and A.K. Goel Circadian Aspect of Photoperiodic Time Measurement in a Female House Sparrow, Passer domesticus J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 1995; 10(4): 319 - 323. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Juss, V. M. King, V. Kumar, and B. K. Follett Does Unusual Entrainment of the Circadian System Under T36h Photocycles Reduce the Critical Daylength for Photoperiodic Induction in Japanese Quail? J Biol Rhythms, March 1, 1995; 10(1): 17 - 32. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.T. Enright The Parallactic View, Statistical Testing, and Circular Reasoning J Biol Rhythms, June 1, 1989; 4(2): 183 - 192. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Elliott, M. H. Stetson, and M. Menaker Regulation of Testis Function in Golden Hamsters: A Circadian Clock Measures Photoperiodic Time Science, November 17, 1972; 178(4062): 771 - 773. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||