spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VOGEL, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by VOGEL, S.
Journal of Experimental Biology 44,567-578 (1966)
Published by Company of Biologists 1966


Flight in Drosophila : I. Flight Performance of Tethered Flies

STEVEN VOGEL 1

1 Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass

1. Apparatus has been devised to record the principal parameters of the flight performance of tethered fruit-flies in a wind tunnel.

2. Typically these flies achieve level flight (lift = weight) at 200 cm./sec. and a body angle of + 10°. Lift varies directly with body angle except at very high angles; the stroke parameters are invariant with body angle.

3. Evidence is presented suggesting that these measurements are applicable to free flight.

4. The adaptive significance of the absence of a ‘lift-control reaction’ in fruit-flies is discussed.

Submitted on December 20, 1965




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
F.-O. Lehmann and S. Pick
The aerodynamic benefit of wing-wing interaction depends on stroke trajectory in flapping insect wings
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2007; 210(8): 1362 - 1377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
F.-O. Lehmann, S. P. Sane, and M. Dickinson
The aerodynamic effects of wing-wing interaction in flapping insect wings
J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2005; 208(16): 3075 - 3092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Sun and J. H. Wu
Aerodynamic force generation and power requirements in forward flight in a fruit fly with modeled wing motion
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 3065 - 3083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
S. N. Fry, R. Sayaman, and M. H. Dickinson
The Aerodynamics of Free-Flight Maneuvers in Drosophila
Science, April 18, 2003; 300(5618): 495 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Sun and J. Tang
Lift and power requirements of hovering flight in Drosophila virilis
J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2002; 205(16): 2413 - 2427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
C. F. HERREID II, D. A. PRAWEL, and R. J. FULL
Energetics of Running Cockroaches
Science, April 17, 1981; 212(4492): 331 - 333.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1966