spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FISHER, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by FISHER, R. C.
Journal of Experimental Biology 38,605-629 (1961)
Published by Company of Biologists 1961


A Study in Insect Multiparasitism : II. The Mechanism and Control of Competition for Possession of the Host

RODERICK C. FISHER 1

1 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, and Entomology Research Institute for Biological Control Belleville, Ontario, Canada; Department of Zoology, University of London King's College, Strand, London W.C. 2

1. In multiparasitism of larvae of the moth Ephestia serecarium by the solitary ichneumonid endoparasitoids Horogenes chrysostictos and Nemeritis canescens, neither has an intrinsic superiority over the other and free competition occurs between their immature stages for possession of the host.

2. There is no interaction between the eggs of these species before they hatch.

3. When larvae of these two species are present in the same host at the same time they compete for possession of the host by one of two mechanisms, physical attack or physiological suppression.

4. When the larvae hatch from the eggs at the same time, neither has a clear advantage over the other and either species may win by physically attacking the other with its mandibles.

5. If they are of different ages, the older larva usually wins by physical attack when the difference in age is less than 40 hr. at 25°C.

6. If the difference in age is 50 hr. or more at 25°C. the older larva always wins in competition by physiological suppression of the younger one.

7. The factors which are important in determining the result of competition are: difference in age between the ist-instar larvae at eclosion, environmental temperature and the species of host attacked, which determine the parasites' rate of development.

8. A hypothesis of asphyxiation is presented with experimental evidence of its validity as an explanation of the physiological suppression of supernumerary parasitoids. It is suggested that asphyxiation by oxygen-lack can better account for physiological suppression than the theories of toxic secretion, specific inhibitor and starvation.

Submitted on March 23, 1961







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1961