spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JOSEPHSON, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by JOSEPHSON, R. K.
Journal of Experimental Biology 38,579-593 (1961)
Published by Company of Biologists 1961


Repetitive Potentials Following Brief Electric Stimuli in a Hydroid

ROBERT K. JOSEPHSON 1

1 University of California Los Angeles

1. Electrical pulses (amplitude -0.05 to -15 mV.; duration 20-120 msec.) have been recorded from the stolon of Cordylophora lacustris following stimulation. These pulses are propagated with an average velocity of 2.7 cm./sec. at 22° C.

2. Brief electric shocks of little more than threshold intensity can evoke bursts of pulses. The number of pulses in a burst increases with stimulus intensity, but the shape and size of individual pulses do not.

3. Repetitive stimulation causes facilitation of both size of single pulses and number of pulses in a burst. Refractory period, if present, is variable. The minimum interval between two pulses is about 200 msec.

4. Mechanical stimulation evokes pulses identical to those evoked by electrical stimulation.

5. The greater the number of pulses recorded in the stolon near a polyp, the greater and faster is the contraction of that polyp.

6. The number of pulses, but not their individual sizes, decreases with increasing distance from the point of stimulation.

7. It is concluded that conduction in the stolon and the electrical pulses are due to nervous activity and that the conducting system is a network having interneural junctions which sometimes require to be facilitated.

Submitted on January 20, 1961




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. Thorpe, G. Shelton, and M. Laverack
Colonial nervous control of lophophore retraction in cheilostome Bryozoa
Science, July 4, 1975; 189(4196): 60 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. K. Josephson and M. Macklin
Transepithelial Potentials in Hydra
Science, June 23, 1967; 156(3782): 1629 - 1631.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1961