spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NEEDHAM, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by NEEDHAM, A. E.
Journal of Experimental Biology 37,775-782 (1960)
Published by Company of Biologists 1960


The Arginase Activity of the Tissues of the Earthworms Lumbricus Terrestris L., and Eisenia Foetida (Savigny)

A. E. NEEDHAM 1

1 Department of Zoology and Comparative Anatomy, University Museum, Oxford

1. The difference in arginase activity between the tissues of Eisenia and those of Lumbricus shows a relationship to the difference in urea output by living worms of the two species under the same dietary régime.

2. In Eisenia the difference in activity between the tissues of fasting and feeding worms is much smaller than in Lumbricus. The specific outputs of urea by living, fasting and feeding worms likewise differ less than in Lumbricus.

3. These facts strengthen previous evidence in favour of a Krebs-Henseleit type of mechanism for urea production in earthworms.

4. In Eisenia the difference in arginase activity between gut and body wall is similar to, but smaller than, that in Lumbricus, and the body wall makes a major contribution to the total activity.

5. The combined concentrations of ammonia-, amino-, and urea-nitrogen initially present in homogenates of the tissues of these worms are proportional to the combined amounts of the three components excreted per unit weight by living worms of the same species and régime.

6. The two species differ in a number of other properties investigated.

Submitted on May 4, 1960







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1960