spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Online submission spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EWER, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by EWER, R. F.
Journal of Experimental Biology 28,374-384 (1951)
Published by Company of Biologists 1951


The Effect of Pitressin and Pitocin on Water Balance in Bufo Regularis Reuss

R. F. EWER 1

1 Department of Zoology, University of Natal

1. In Bufo regularis the injection of either pitressin or pitocin is followed by an increase in the rate of water absorption through the skin, together with a marked decrease in urine flow. The response to pitressin is greater than that to pitocin.

2. The effect of pitocin in increasing water uptake can be attributed to the activity of the 5-10% of the pressor fraction which it contains.

3. A mixture of pitressin and pitocin has the same effect on water balance as a corresponding dose of pituitrin. Pitressin alone has a greater anti-diuretic effect than it has when pitocin is added.

4. Taking into account the antagonistic action of pitocin to pitressin it is possible to account for the anti-diuretic action of pitocin in terms of its pressor fraction content.

5. It is concluded that the pressor fraction is the main factor responsible for both the dermal and the renal components of the water-balance effect produced in B. regularis by injection of mammalian posterior pituitary extracts. This conclusion is discussed in relation to the findings of other workers.

Submitted on February 3, 1951







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1951