spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROEDER, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by WEIANT, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ROEDER, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by WEIANT, E. A.
Journal of Experimental Biology 27,1-13 (1950)
Published by Company of Biologists 1950


The Electrical and Mechanical Events of Neuro-Muscular Transmission in the Cockroach, Periplaneta Americana (L.)

KENNETH D. ROEDER 1 and ELIZABETH A. WEIANT 1

1 Tufts College, Medford 55, Massachusetts

1. A nerve-muscle preparation in the metathorax of the cockroach is described. It consists of the second tergal muscle of the trochantin (muscle 162 of Carbonell) innervated by a branch of nerve 3 A. Electrical changes are recorded from electrodes on the muscle surface, and the onset of contraction is registered by the stylus of a piezo-electric pick-up.

2. With low (3-5 per sec.) stimulation rates at room temperature the neuromuscular delay is less than 1.2 msec., and the latent period of contraction about 3.0 msec. The muscle potential is 4-5 msec. in duration, positive in sign at the muscle surface, and monophasic in form with either monopolar or bipolar recording. During excitation a potential gradient develops along the muscle, the greatest positivity being in the middle near the point of nerve entry.

3. Neither electrical nor mechanical response show gradations with changes in stimulus strength or frequency. No facilitation is evident, and the response appears to be due to stimulation of a single quick motor nerve fibre.

4. In order to study the effects of direct stimulation nerve 3 was sectioned and allowed to degenerate. All trace of the peripheral nerve stump was lost after 3 days, when the muscle became completely inexcitable to all forms of electrical stimulation. There were no gross structural changes which would account for this loss of excitability.

5. It is concluded that the recorded muscle potential in the cockroach is analogous to the vertebrate end-plate potential, being the sum of local muscle potentials developing simultaneously in several fibres, and sequentially at several innervation points along the same fibre. Conduction within the muscle is carried out entirely by motor nerve fibres.

6. Possible causes of the positive sign of the muscle during activity are discussed.

Note:

Work described in this paper was done under contract between the Medical Division, Chemical Corps U.S. Army and Tufts College. Under the terms of this contract the Chemical Corps neither restricts nor is responsible for the opinions or conclusions of the authors.

Submitted on May 6, 1949







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1950