QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by LISSMANN, H. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by LISSMANN, H. W.

Journal of Experimental Biology 23,162-176 (1946)
Published by Company of Biologists 1946

The Neurological Basis of the Locomotory Rhythm in the Spinal Dogfish (Scyllium Canicula, Acanthias Vulgaris) : II. The Effect of De-Afferentation

H. W. LISSMANN ¹

¹ Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge

Some of the more striking effects of de-afferentation in the spinal dogfish are diagrammatically represented in Fig. 13.

1. The persistent locomotory rhythm of a spinal dogfish depends upon afferent excitation. If all afferent excitation is cut off by severance of all dorsal roots, the rhythm is abolished (Fig. 13, 1).

2. The rhythm clearly emerges when about half the number of all the dorsal roots is transected, irrespective whether the anterior or the posterior half of the animal be de-afferentated (Fig. 13, 2 and 3), or whether complete unilateral de-afferentation is executed (Fig. 13, 4).

3. Extensively de-afferentated preparations may exhibit swimming movements after exteroceptive stimulation. These swimming movements do not persist.

4. Preparations de-afferentated except for the tail exhibit after exteroceptive stimulation a static reflex posture.

5. The de-afferentated musculature takes part in both tonic and rhythmic responses as long as it is connected through the spinal cord with normally innervated musculature.

6. In response to electrical stimulation applied to the cord of a spinal dogfish two distinct types of rhythmic response have been evoked.

7. No rhythmic responses have bee obtained through electrical stimulation of the spinal cord in completely de-afferentated preparations.

8. No evidence has been found in support of the view that the swimming rhythm emanates through a spontaneous, automatic activity from the central nervous system.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. S. Edwards THE CENTRAL NERVOUS CONTROL OF INSECT FLIGHT J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2006; 209(22): 4411 - 4413. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F Delcomyn Neural basis of rhythmic behavior in animals Science, October 31, 1980; 210(4469): 492 - 498. [Abstract] [PDF]