QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by LISSMANN, H. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by LISSMANN, H. W.

Journal of Experimental Biology 23,143-161 (1946)
Published by Company of Biologists 1946

The Neurological Basis of the Locomotory Rhythm in the Spinal Dogfish (Scyllium Canicula, Acanthias Vulgaris) : I. Reflex Behaviour

H. W. LISSMANN ¹

¹ Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge

1. Body and fin reflexes in the spinal dogfish, Scyllium canicula and Acanthias vulgaris, are described.

2. A reflex posture can be induced in inactive spinal preparations through localized exteroceptive stimuli. The location of the primary and secondary contraction areas is determined by the site of stimulation.

3. Spinal preparations of Scyllium canicula and Acanthias vulgaris display a persistent locomotory rhythm as long as they are free from contact.

4. Diffuse touch to the ventral surface of a spinal preparation has an inhibitory effect on the swimming movements. Some dogfish remain immobile after the ventral contact has been discontinued, but resume their persistent swimming after application of a gentle exteroceptive stimulus of short duration.

5. Through feeble transitory stimuli any individual swimming stroke can be retarded, temporarily arrested, reversed, accelerated and augmented. The reaction depends on the site of the stimulation and on the momentary phase of the swimming movement at which it is applied.

6. The rhythm emerging after the application of a transitory stimulus is, as a rule, out of phase with the rhythm as recorded prior to the application of the stimulus. Therefore the response cannot be interpreted as resulting from a super-position of an independent automatic rhythm integrating with a reflex, but must be considered as an interaction of two equal and mutually dependent processes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. S. Edwards THE CENTRAL NERVOUS CONTROL OF INSECT FLIGHT J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2006; 209(22): 4411 - 4413. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F Delcomyn Neural basis of rhythmic behavior in animals Science, October 31, 1980; 210(4469): 492 - 498. [Abstract] [PDF]