First published online December 28, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 213, 331-338 (2010)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2010
doi: 10.1242/jeb.035386
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosner, R.
Right arrow Articles by Warzecha, A.-K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosner, R.
Right arrow Articles by Warzecha, A.-K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Behavioural state affects motion-sensitive neurones in the fly visual system

R. Rosner*, M. Egelhaaf and A.-K. Warzecha

Lehrstuhl für Neurobiologie, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany

* Author for correspondence at present address: Fachbereich Biologie, Tierphysiologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany (rosner{at}staff.uni-marburg.de)

Accepted 5 October 2009

The strength of stimulus-induced responses at the neuronal and the behavioural level often depends on the internal state of an animal. Within pathways processing sensory information and eventually controlling behavioural responses, such gain changes can originate at several sites. Using motion-sensitive lobula plate tangential cells (LPTCs) of blowflies, we address whether and in which way information processing changes for two different states of motor activity. We distinguish between the two states on the basis of haltere movements. Halteres are the evolutionarily transformed hindwings of flies. They oscillate when the animals walk or fly. LPTCs mediate, amongst other behaviours, head optomotor responses. These are either of large or small amplitude depending on the state of motor activity. Here we find that LPTC responses also depend on the motor activity of flies. In particular, LPTC responses are enhanced when halteres oscillate. Nevertheless, the response changes of LPTCs do not account for the corresponding large gain changes of head movements. Moreover, haltere activity itself does not change the activity of LPTCs. Instead, we propose that a central signal associated with motor activity changes the gain of head optomotor responses and the response properties of LPTCs.

Key words: LPTC, arousal, behavioural state, fly, motor activity, visual system


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

MOVEMENT AFFECTS FLY'S VISION
Kathryn Knight
JEB 2010 213: iii. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. Knight
MOVEMENT AFFECTS FLY'S VISION
J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2010; 213(2): iii - iii.
[Full Text] [PDF]