QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online April 17, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 1259-1269 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.025411

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Helm, B. Articles by Gwinner, E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Helm, B. Articles by Gwinner, E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Circannual basis of geographically distinct bird schedules

Barbara Helm^*, Ingrid Schwabl and Eberhard Gwinner

Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 82346 Andechs, Germany

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: helm{at}orn.mpg.de)

Accepted 9 February 2009

To anticipate seasonal change, organisms schedule their annual activities by using calendrical cues like photoperiod. The use of cues must be fitted to local conditions because schedules differ between species and habitats. In complete absence of temporal information, many species show persistent circannual cycles that are synchronised, but not driven, by photoperiod. The contribution of circannual rhythms to timing under natural photoperiodic conditions is still unclear. In a suite of experiments, we examined timing in two closely related songbirds (Siberian and European stonechats) that inhabit similar latitudes but differ in seasonal behaviour. Under a more continental climate, Siberian stonechats breed later, moult faster and migrate further than European stonechats. We tested hypotheses for seasonal timing mechanisms by comparing the birds under constant and naturally changing daylengths. The taxa retained characteristic reproductive and moult schedules and hybrids behaved roughly intermediately. Based on their distinct circannual cycles, we expected European and Siberian stonechats to differ in photoperiodic responses at a given time of year. We found that the taxa responded, as predicted, in opposite ways to photoperiodic simulations as experienced on different migration routes. The findings indicate that circannual rhythms reflect geographically distinct periodic changes in seasonal disposition and cue-response mechanisms. Under natural daylengths, the phase relationship of the underlying circannual rhythm to the external year determines the action of photoperiod. Circannual rhythms are widespread among long-lived species. Accordingly, responses to environmental change, range expansion and novel migration patterns may depend on the particulars of a species' underlying circannual programming.

Key words: circannual, photoperiod, seasonality, reproduction, migration, bird

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Helm Geographically distinct reproductive schedules in a changing world: Costly implications in captive Stonechats Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2009; 49(5): 563 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]