QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online March 27, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 1170-1184 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.027060

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rosner, R. Articles by Warzecha, A. K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Rosner, R. Articles by Warzecha, A. K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Variability of blowfly head optomotor responses

R. Rosner^1,2,*, M. Egelhaaf¹, J. Grewe³ and A. K. Warzecha^1,2

¹ Lehrstuhl für Neurobiologie, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
² Psychologisches Institut II, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany
³ Abteilung Biologie II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: ronny.rosner{at}uni-bielefeld.de)

Accepted 3 February 2009

Behavioural responses of an animal are variable even when the animal experiences the same sensory input several times. This variability can arise from stochastic processes inherent to the nervous system. Also, the internal state of an animal may influence a particular behavioural response. In the present study, we analyse the variability of visually induced head pitch responses of tethered blowflies by high-speed cinematography. We found these optomotor responses to be highly variable in amplitude. Most of the variability can be attributed to two different internal states of the flies with high and low optomotor gain, respectively. Even within a given activity state, there is some variability of head optomotor responses. The amount of this variability differs for the two optomotor gain states. Moreover, these two activity states can be distinguished on a fine timescale and without visual stimulation, on the basis of the occurrence of peculiar head jitter movements. Head jitter goes along with high gain optomotor responses and haltere oscillations. Halteres are evolutionary transformed hindwings that oscillate when blowflies walk or fly. Their main function is to serve as equilibrium organs by detecting Coriolis forces and to mediate gaze stabilisation. However, their basic oscillating activity was also suggested to provide a gain-modulating signal. Our experiments demonstrate that halteres are not necessary for high gain head pitch to occur. Nevertheless, we find the halteres to be responsible for one component of head jitter movements. This component may be the inevitable consequence of their function as equilibrium and gaze-stabilising organs.

Key words: optomotor response, variability, behavioural state, halteres, head movements, arousal state

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Huston and H. G. Krapp Nonlinear Integration of Visual and Haltere Inputs in Fly Neck Motor Neurons J. Neurosci., October 21, 2009; 29(42): 13097 - 13105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]