spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online March 12, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 934-944 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.027680
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mendonça, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gamperl, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mendonça, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gamperl, A. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Nervous and humoral control of cardiac performance in the winter flounder (Pleuronectes americanus)

Paula C. Mendonça and A. Kurt Gamperl*

Ocean Sciences Centre, Memorial University, St John's, Canada, NL A1C 5S7

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: kgamperl{at}mun.ca)

Accepted 20 January 2009

Previous studies have suggested that flatfish lack adrenergic cardiac innervation and have a limited humoral adrenergic stress response. However, data on neurohormonal control of flatfish cardiac function is scarce, and has never been directly studied in vivo. Hence, we (1) injected neural and humoral antagonists into flounder (Pleuronectes americanus) in vivo to determine the contribution of autonomic innervation and circulating catecholamines to the control of resting cardiac function; (2) measured pre- and post-stress (90 s chase) catecholamine levels in this species; and (3) constructed in vivo catecholamine dose–response curves for cardiovascular function based on the results of the second experiment. In addition, we quantified the density (Bmax) and ligand-binding affinity (Kd) of flounder ventricular cell-surface β-adrenoreceptors, and established whether they were of β1 or β2 subtype using pharmacological antagonists. The cholinergic contribution to resting flounder heart rate was comparable to other teleosts (cholinergic tonus 26%). Interestingly, however, bretylium increased heart rate, resulting in a negative resting adrenergic tonus (–11.9%), and we were unable to demonstrate that catecholamines supported cardiac function at rest or at circulating concentrations approximating those following an exhaustive chase (adrenaline, 21 nmol l–1; noradrenaline, 14 nmol l–1). Myocardial Bmax was very high in the flounder (252.8 fmol mg–1 protein), and it appears that flounder ventricular β-adrenoreceptors are predominantly of the β2 subtype [based on the inability of atenolol to displace [3H]CGP from the β-adrenoreceptors, and the IC50 value for ICI 118551 (1.91x10–6 mol l–1)]. However, the extremely low affinity (Kd 1.02 nmol l–1) for these receptors raises the possibility that the flounder heart is also populated by β3-adrenoreceptors.

Key words: beta-adrenoreceptors, binding affinity, catecholamines, flatfish, heart, teleost


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009