spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online March 12, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 895-900 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.024521
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collett, M.
Right arrow Articles by Collett, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Collett, M.
Right arrow Articles by Collett, T. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The learning and maintenance of local vectors in desert ant navigation

Matthew Collett1,* and Thomas S. Collett2

1 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
2 School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: matthew.collett{at}zoo.ox.ac.uk)

Accepted 16 December 2008

The desert ant Cataglyphis fortis has at least three types of navigational strategy that can guide it between its nest and a familiar food site. The initial strategy after first finding a food site is based on a path integration memory of the position of the food site with respect to the nest. A second strategy is based on visual snapshot memories of features viewed from near or on the way to the food site. A third strategy uses local vector memories of the direction and length of habitual route segments. We show here that while such local vectors encode sufficient information to guide an individual along both the direction and distance of a route segment, its acquisition and long-term maintenance requires support from the other two strategies. We trained ants along an L-shaped route, designed to show that ants can learn local vectors on the way to a food site. The sharp turn appears to present particular difficulties for the ants. When low bushes 20–30 m from the route were removed, local vectors were briefly unaffected, but then deteriorated. The vectors improved again once the missing bushes were replaced by artificial landmarks. The fragility of local vector memories may permit an ant the flexibility to adapt its route to fluctuations in the distribution of its resources.

Key words: cognition, insects, navigation, spatial


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

ANTS NEED LANDMARKS TO RETAIN NAVIGATION MEMORIES
Kathryn Knight
JEB 2009 212: i. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Collett and T. S. Collett
Local and global navigational coordinate systems in desert ants
J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2009; 212(7): 901 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. Knight
ANTS NEED LANDMARKS TO RETAIN NAVIGATION MEMORIES
J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2009; 212(7): i - ii.
[Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009