spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Propose a Workshop for 2011 spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online March 12, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 1021-1031 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.023507
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simon, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Trimmer, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Simon, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Trimmer, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Movement encoding by a stretch receptor in the soft-bodied caterpillar, Manduca sexta

Michael A. Simon* and Barry A. Trimmer

Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: Michael.Simon{at}tufts.edu)

Accepted 6 January 2009

In a wide variety of animals, stretch receptors provide proprioceptive feedback for motion control. However, for animals that lack a stiff skeleton, it is unclear what information is being detected and how this is incorporated into behavior. Because such animals can change their body shape from moment-to-moment, information about body configuration could be particularly important for coordination. This study uses larval stage Lepidoptera (Manduca sexta) to examine how the longitudinal stretch receptor organ (SRO) responds to behaviorally appropriate movements. We characterized the responses of the SRO to changes in strain using magnitudes and velocities matching those seen physiologically. We found that the SRO response characteristics are compatible with the regulation of stance and with the defensive response to noxious stimuli. However, we also found that movements during crawling produce SRO responses that are dominated by the interdependence of phasic, tonic and slowly adaptive components. Ablation of stretch receptors in the proleg-bearing, fourth abdominal segment did not have any observable effect on behaviors, which suggests that the SROs are not essential for coordinating overt movements. We discuss the implications of these findings in the context of specific behaviors, and explore how the SRO response might be utilized during animal behavior.

Key words: locomotion, Manduca sexta, mechanosensors


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009