QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online February 27, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 835-842 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.023572

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, C. L. Articles by Evans, C. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Smith, C. L. Articles by Evans, C. S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Silent tidbitting in male fowl, Gallus gallus: a referential visual signal with multiple functions

Carolynn L. Smith^* and Christopher S. Evans

Centre for the Integrative Study of Animal Behaviour, Department of Brain, Behaviour and Evolution, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: kls{at}galliform.bhs.mq.edu.au)

Accepted 6 January 2009

With the notable exception of bee dances, there are no established examples of multimodal referential signals. The food calls of male fowl, Gallus gallus, are functionally referential and the acoustic component of a multimodal display. However, the specificity of the receiver's response to the visual component (tidbitting) has never been tested. Here we provide the first detailed analysis of tidbitting, and test the hypothesis that these characteristic movements are functionally referential. We conducted a playback experiment with five high-definition video stimuli: Silent tidbit, Matched-frequency motion in the opposite direction, Silent crows, Inactive male and Empty cage. Females searched for food more during Silent tidbitting than under any other condition, suggesting that this visual display specifically predicts the presence of food and hence has similar functional properties to food calls. Silent tidbitting was also singularly effective at evoking approach and close inspection, which may enhance signal memorability. These social responses suggest that the visual component of the display has the unique function of triggering assessment of signaler identity and quality as a potential mate. The acoustic and visual components are hence redundant as a food signal, but synergistic when additional functions are considered. These findings emphasize the perceptual complexity of multimodal displays and provide the first demonstration of multimodal referential signaling in a vertebrate.

Key words: multimodal communication, visual displays, food calls, referential signals

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?