QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online February 27, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 753-760 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.023861

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Helmuth, B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Helmuth, B. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Commentary

From cells to coastlines: how can we use physiology to forecast the impacts of climate change?

Brian Helmuth

University of South Carolina, Department of Biological Sciences and School of the Environment, Columbia, SC 29208, USA

e-mail: helmuth{at}biol.sc.edu

Accepted 8 January 2009

The interdisciplinary fields of conservation physiology, macrophysiology, and mechanistic ecological forecasting have recently emerged as means of integrating detailed physiological responses to the broader questions of ecological and evolutionary responses to global climate change. Bridging the gap between large-scale records of weather and climate (as measured by remote sensing platforms, buoys and ground-based weather stations) and the physical world as experienced by organisms (niche-level measurements) requires a mechanistic understanding of how `environmental signals' (parameters such as air, surface and water temperature, food availability, water flow) are translated into signals at the scale of the organism or cell (e.g. body temperature, food capture, hydrodynamic force, aerobic capacity). Predicting the impacts of how changing environments affect populations and ecosystems further mandates an understanding of how organisms `filter' these signals via their physiological response (e.g. whether they respond to high or low frequencies, whether there is a time lag in response, etc.) and must be placed within the context of adult movement and the dispersal of larvae and gametes. Recent studies have shown that patterns of physiological stress in nature are far more complex in space and time than previously assumed and challenge the long-held paradigm that patterns of biogeographic distribution can be based on simple environmental gradients. An integrative, systems-based approach can provide an understanding of the roles of environmental and physiological variability in driving ecological responses and can offer considerable insight and predictive capacity to researchers, resource managers and policy makers involved in planning for the current and future effects of climate change.

Key words: biogeography, climate change, conservation physiology, ecological forecasting, biophysical modeling

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. P. Farrell Environment, antecedents and climate change: lessons from the study of temperature physiology and river migration of salmonids J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2009; 212(23): 3771 - 3780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Denny and B. Helmuth Confronting the physiological bottleneck: A challenge from ecomechanics Integr. Comp. Biol., September 1, 2009; 49(3): 197 - 201. [Full Text] [PDF]