QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online February 13, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 620-626 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.026641

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carcaud, J. Articles by Sandoz, J.-C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Carcaud, J. Articles by Sandoz, J.-C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Odour aversion after olfactory conditioning of the sting extension reflex in honeybees

Julie Carcaud, Edith Roussel, Martin Giurfa and Jean-Christophe Sandoz^*

Research Centre for Animal Cognition, CNRS–University Paul-Sabatier (UMR 5169), 31062 Toulouse cedex 09, France

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: sandoz{at}cict.fr)

Accepted 2 December 2008

In Pavlovian conditioning, an originally neutral stimulus (conditioned stimulus or CS) gains control over an animal's reflex after its association with a biologically relevant stimulus (unconditioned stimulus or US). As a consequence, a conditioned response is emitted by the animal upon further CS presentations. In such a situation, the subject exhibits a reflex response, so that whether the CS thereby acquires a positive or a negative value for the animal is difficult to assess. In honeybees, Apis mellifera, an odour (CS) can be associated either with sucrose solution (US) in the appetitive conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex (PER), or with an electric shock (US) in the aversive conditioning of the sting extension reflex (SER). The term `aversive' may not apply to the latter as bees do not suppress SER as a consequence of learning but, on the contrary, start emitting SER to the CS. To determine whether the CS acquires a positive or a negative value in these conditioning forms, we compared the orientation behaviour of freely walking honeybees in an olfactory-cued Y-maze after training them with an odour–sucrose association (PER conditioning) or an odour–shock association (SER conditioning). We show that the same odours can acquire either a positive value when associated to sucrose, or a negative value when associated to an electric shock, as bees respectively approach or avoid the CS in the Y-maze. Importantly, these results clearly establish the aversive nature of SER conditioning in honeybees.

Key words: appetitive learning, aversive learning, classical conditioning, avoidance, olfaction, honeybee

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Provecho and R. Josens Olfactory memory established during trophallaxis affects food search behaviour in ants J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2009; 212(20): 3221 - 3227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]