QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online February 13, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 604-609 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.024349

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gillis, G. B. Articles by Irschick, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Gillis, G. B. Articles by Irschick, D. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Losing stability: tail loss and jumping in the arboreal lizard Anolis carolinensis

Gary B. Gillis^1,*, Lauren A. Bonvini^1, and Duncan J. Irschick²

¹ Department of Biological Sciences, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA 01075, USA
² Department of Biology and Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Graduate Program, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: ggillis{at}mtholyoke.edu)

Accepted 3 December 2008

Voluntary loss of an appendage, or autotomy, is a remarkable behavior that is widespread among many arthropods and lower vertebrates. Its immediate benefit, generally escape from a predator, is balanced by various costs, including impaired locomotor performance, reproductive success and long-term survival. Among vertebrates, autotomy is most widespread in lizards, in which tail loss has been documented in close to 100 species. Despite numerous studies of the potential costs of tail autotomy in lizards, none have focused on the importance of the tail in jumping. Using high-speed video we recorded jumps from six lizards (Anolis carolinensis) both before and after removing 80% of the tail to test the hypothesis that tail loss has a significant effect on jumping kinematics. Several key performance metrics, including jump distance and takeoff velocity, were not affected by experimental tail removal, averaging 21 cm and 124 cm s^–1, respectively, in both tailed and tailless lizards. However, in-air stability during jumping was greatly compromised after tail removal. Lizards without tails rotated posteriorly more than 30 deg., on average, between takeoff and landing (and sometimes more than 90 deg.) compared with an average of 5 deg. of rotation in lizards with intact tails. Such exaggerated posterior rotation prevents coordinated landing, which is critical for animals that spend much of their time jumping to and from small branches. This work augments recent experiments demonstrating the importance of the tail as a mid-air stabilizer during falling in geckos, and emphasizes new and severe functional costs associated with tail autotomy in arboreal lizards.

Key words: jumping, kinematics, autotomy, anolis

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

LEAPING TAILLESS LIZARDS TOPPLE

Kathryn Knight
JEB 2009 212: i. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. E. Higham and A. P. Russell Flip, flop and fly: modulated motor control and highly variable movement patterns of autotomized gecko tails Biol Lett, February 23, 2010; 6(1): 70 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Knight LEAPING TAILLESS LIZARDS TOPPLE J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2009; 212(5): i - i. [Full Text] [PDF]