QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online November 27, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 4027-4032 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.033845

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Wolschin, F. Articles by Amdam, G. V. PubMed Articles by Wolschin, F. Articles by Amdam, G. V. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Structural and proteomic analyses reveal regional brain differences during honeybee aging

F. Wolschin^1,2,*,, D. Münch^1,* and G. V. Amdam^1,2

¹ Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, University of Life Sciences, N-1432 Ås, Norway
² School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, 85287 Tempe, USA

Author for correspondence (f.wolschin{at}gmail.com)

Accepted 2 September 2009

Among insects, learning is particularly well studied in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and the honeybee Apis mellifera. A senescence-dependent decline in classic pavlovian conditioning is demonstrated for both species. To understand how aging affects learning, genetic approaches used with Drosophila can benefit from complementary studies in Apis. Specifically, honeybees have a larger brain size allowing for compartment-specific approaches, and a unique life-history plasticity. They usually perform within-nest tasks early in life (nest bees) and later they collect food (foragers). Senescence of learning performance is a function of the bees' foraging duration but underlying causes are poorly understood. As cognitive aging is commonly associated with structural and biochemical changes in the brain, we hypothesized that brain areas implicated in learning change in synaptic and biochemical composition with increased foraging duration. First, we used synapse-specific immunohistochemistry and proteomics to screen for alterations in the calyx region of the mushroom body, a key structure for memory formation. Using proteomics, we next profiled the central brain, which comprises all higher-order integration centers. We show that, with increased foraging duration, levels of kinases, synaptic- and neuronal growth-related proteins decline in the central brain while the calyx region remains intact both in structure and biochemistry. We suggest that proteome-level changes within major anatomical sites of memory formation other than the calyx region could be central to learning dysfunction. These include large compartments of the central brain, such as the mushroom body's output regions and the antennal lobes. Our data provide novel information toward heterogeneity in the aging insect brain, and demonstrate advantages of the honeybee for invertebrate neurogerontological research.

Key words: senescence, aging, neuronal degradation, learning, immunohistochemistry, proteomics

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?