spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online October 30, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 3751-3761 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.034462
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Metzger, K. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Metzger, K. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Quantitative analysis of the effect of prey properties on feeding kinematics in two species of lizards

Keith A. Metzger

Hofstra University School of Medicine in partnership with North Shore-LIJ Health, 145 Hofstra University, East Library Wing, Hempstead, NY 11549-1010, USA

Keith.Metzger{at}hofstra.edu

Accepted 25 August 2009

Studies of the functional morphology of feeding have typically not included an analysis of the potential for the kinematics of the gape cycle to vary based on the material properties of the prey item being consumed. Variation in prey properties is expected not only to reveal variation in feeding function, but allows testing of the functional role of the phases of the gape cycle. The jaw kinematics of two species of lizards are analyzed when feeding trials are conducted using quantitative control of prey mass, hardness and mobility. For both species, there were statistically significant prey effects on feeding kinematics for all the prey properties evaluated (i.e. prey mass, hardness and mobility). Of these three prey properties, prey mass had a more significant effect on feeding kinematics than prey hardness or mobility. Revealing the impact of varying prey properties on feeding kinematics helps to establish the baseline level of functional variability in the feeding system. Additionally, these data confirm the previously hypothesized functional role of the slow open (SO) phase of the gape cycle as allowing for physical conformation of the tongue to the surface of the food bolus in preparation for further intraoral transport.

Key words: Feeding, lizards, prey properties, functional morphology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. F. Ross, A. L. Baden, J. Georgi, A. Herrel, K. A. Metzger, D. A. Reed, V. Schaerlaeken, and M. S. Wolff
Chewing variation in lepidosaurs and primates
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2010; 213(4): 572 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009