QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online August 28, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 2925-2933 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.032953

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Turesson, H. Articles by Domenici, P. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Turesson, H. Articles by Domenici, P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Preparing for escape: anti-predator posture and fast-start performance in gobies

Håkan Turesson¹, Andrea Satta^1,2 and Paolo Domenici^1,2,*

¹ IMC-International Marine Centre, Località Sa Mardini, 09072 Torregrande, Oristano, Italy
² CNR-IAMC-c/o International Marine Centre, Località Sa Mardini, 09072 Torregrande, Oristano, Italy

^* Author for correspondence (paolo.domenici{at}iamc.cnr.it)

Accepted 15 June 2009

The adoption of postures as a response to threats is often interpreted in terms of predator detection or signalling (e.g. vigilance and defence display). The possibility that an alternative or additional function of anti-predator postures might be to enhance the subsequent escape has been largely unexplored. Here, we use black goby (Gobius niger) to test the hypothesis that a postural curvature caused by a bending response (i.e. a slow muscle contraction which bends the body with no forward displacement) induced by a weak stimulus (WS) may affect escape responses. Three experiments were carried out. (1) Control and WS-stimulated fish were startled using lateral mechanical stimuli, to test whether the orientation of the postural C-bend affected escape direction and performance. Postural curvature was defined as positive when escapes were towards the convex side of the postural C-shape, and negative when they were towards the concave side. Locomotor performance increased with postural curvature, although fish showed a preference for escaping away from the stimulus regardless of postural curvature. (2) Control and WS-stimulated fish were startled from above, hence minimising the directionality of the threat on the horizontal plane. WS-stimulated fish showed a bias towards escaping from a positive curvature, thereby enhancing their locomotor performance. (3) Field observations with stimuli coming from above showed that gobies escape most often towards the convex side of the postural C-shape. By escaping from positively curved postures, most of the initial tailsweep is directed backwards and may provide more thrust than when starting from straight or negatively curved postures. Hence, the anti-predator posture adopted by alerted benthic fishes may `prepare' them for their subsequent escape response because it conveys an advantage when they are attacked from above (a likely occurrence), although when gobies are stimulated horizontally, escape direction may be favoured over high locomotor performance when the two trade off.

Key words: anti-predator posture, anti-predator response, escape response, gobies

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?