spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online August 14, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 2773-2780 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.031310
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schimpf, N. G.
Right arrow Articles by White, C. R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schimpf, N. G.
Right arrow Articles by White, C. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cockroaches breathe discontinuously to reduce respiratory water loss

Natalie G. Schimpf*, Philip G. D. Matthews, Robbie S. Wilson and Craig R. White

School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4000, Australia

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: n.schimpf{at}uq.edu.au)

Accepted 8 June 2009

The reasons why many insects breathe discontinuously at rest are poorly understood and hotly debated. Three adaptive hypotheses attempt to explain the significance of these discontinuous gas exchange cycles (DGCs), whether it be to save water, to facilitate gas exchange in underground environments or to limit oxidative damage. Comparative studies favour the water saving hypothesis and mechanistic studies are equivocal but no study has examined the acclimation responses of adult insects chronically exposed to a range of respiratory environments. The present research is the first manipulative study of such chronic exposure to take a strong-inference approach to evaluating the competing hypotheses according to the explicit predictions stemming from them. Adult cockroaches (Nauphoeta cinerea) were chronically exposed to various treatments of different respiratory gas compositions (O2, CO2 and humidity) and the DGC responses were interpreted in light of the a priori predictions stemming from the competing hypotheses. Rates of mass loss during respirometry were also measured for animals acclimated to a range of humidity conditions. The results refute the hypotheses of oxidative damage and underground gas exchange, and provide evidence supporting the hypothesis that DGCs serve to reduce respiratory water loss: cockroaches exposed to low humidity conditions exchange respiratory gases for shorter durations during each DGC and showed lower rates of body mass loss during respirometry than cockroaches exposed to high humidity conditions.

Key words: DGC, discontinuous gas exchange, hygric, chthonic, oxidative damage, Nauphoeta cinerea


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

COCKROACHES HOLD BREATH TO CONSERVE WATER
Kathryn Knight
JEB 2009 212: i. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol LettHome page
C. M. Williams, S. L. Pelini, J. J. Hellmann, and B. J. Sinclair
Intra-individual variation allows an explicit test of the hygric hypothesis for discontinuous gas exchange in insects
Biol Lett, November 18, 2009; (2009) rsbl.2009.0803v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. Knight
COCKROACHES HOLD BREATH TO CONSERVE WATER
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2009; 212(17): i - i.
[Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009