QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online July 31, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 2635-2644 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.029330

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Jones, T. T. Articles by Jones, D. R. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jones, T. T. Articles by Jones, D. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Validation of the use of doubly labeled water for estimating metabolic rate in the green turtle (Chelonia mydas L.): a word of caution

T. Todd Jones^1,*, Mervin D. Hastings^1,2, Brian L. Bostrom¹, Russel D. Andrews³ and David R. Jones¹

¹ Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4 Canada
² Conservation and Fisheries Department, Ministry of Natural Resources and Labour, Government of the British Virgin Islands, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands
³ School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks and the Alaska SeaLife Center, Seward, AK 99664, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: tjones{at}zoology.ubc.ca)

Accepted 21 May 2009

Marine turtles often have extremely high water turnover accompanied by a low field metabolic rate (FMR), a combination that can contraindicate the use of doubly labelled water (DLW). Therefore, we conducted a validation study to assess the suitability of the DLW technique for determining FMR of marine turtles. Six green turtles (22.42±3.13 kg) were injected with DLW and placed in a tank of seawater with a respirometer for continuous monitoring of oxygen consumption (MR) over a 5-day period. Trials were conducted for turtles in both fed and fasted states. Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was determined in a dry respirometer and used to calculate energy expenditure. For fed and fasted turtles, total body water (TBW) was 66.67±3.37% and 58.70±7.63% of body mass, and water flux rates were 9.57±1.33% and 6.14±0.65% TBW day^–1, respectively. Water turnover in fasted turtles was 36% lower than that of fed turtles but MR (from oxygen consumption) of fasted turtles (13.77±1.49 kJ kg^–1 day^–1) was 52% lower than in fed turtles (28.66±5.31 kJ kg^–1 day^–1). Deuterium to oxygen-18 turnover rate (k_d:k_o) ratios averaged 0.91±0.02 for fed turtles and 1.07±0.16 for fasted turtles. Fed turtles had a mean group difference of 8% and a mean individual difference of 53% between DLW and respirometry. The DLW method gave negative MR values in fasted turtles and could not be compared with respirometry data. Researchers should use caution when applying the DLW method in marine reptiles, especially when high water flux causes >90% of the labeled oxygen turnover to be due to water exchange.

Key words: doubly labeled water, validation, deuterium, fasting, marine turtle, metabolic rate, oxygen consumption, oxygen-18, respirometry, RER, total body water, water turnover

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?