QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online June 12, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 2016-2022 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.028977

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Warman, P. H. Articles by Ennos, A. R. PubMed Articles by Warman, P. H. Articles by Ennos, A. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Fingerprints are unlikely to increase the friction of primate fingerpads

Peter H. Warman and A. Roland Ennos^*

Faculty of Life Sciences, 3.614 Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: r.ennos{at}manchester.ac.uk)

Accepted 11 April 2009

It is generally assumed that fingerprints improve the grip of primates, but the efficiency of their ridging will depend on the type of frictional behaviour the skin exhibits. Ridges would be effective at increasing friction for hard materials, but in a rubbery material they would reduce friction because they would reduce contact area. In this study we investigated the frictional performance of human fingertips on dry acrylic glass using a modified universal mechanical testing machine, measuring friction at a range of normal loads while also measuring the contact area. Tests were carried out on different fingers, fingers at different angles and against different widths of acrylic sheet to separate the effects of normal force and contact area. The results showed that fingertips behaved more like rubbers than hard solids; their coefficients of friction fell at higher normal forces and friction was higher when fingers were held flatter against wider sheets and hence when contact area was greater. The shear stress was greater at higher pressures, suggesting the presence of a biofilm between the skin and the surface. Fingerprints reduced contact area by a factor of one-third compared with flat skin, however, which would have reduced the friction; this casts severe doubt on their supposed frictional function.

Key words: friction, fingerpads, fingerprints, rubbers, Amonton's law

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

FINGERPRINTS DON'T INCREASE FRICTION

Kathryn Knight
JEB 2009 212: i. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Knight FINGERPRINTS DON'T INCREASE FRICTION J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2009; 212(13): i - i. [Full Text] [PDF]