spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 29, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 1876-1888 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.030551
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, J. M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Federle, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, J. M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Federle, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Division of labour and sex differences between fibrillar, tarsal adhesive pads in beetles: effective elastic modulus and attachment performance

James M. R. Bullock and Walter Federle*

Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: wf222{at}cam.ac.uk)

Accepted 19 March 2009

Many beetles employ arrays of adhesive setae to control attachment during locomotion. Here we investigate whether and how variation in seta structure, both between sexes and between tarsal pads on the same leg, determines the mechanical properties and adhesive performance of fibrillar arrays. We vertically compressed individual adhesive pads to determine their effective elastic modulus. Distal adhesive arrays were significantly softer than middle and proximal ones. Variation in stiffness was mainly due to different seta diameters, but calculated elastic moduli of seta cuticle were relatively constant at 5–16 GPa. Consistent with their greater compliance, distal pads generated higher adhesion and friction on rough substrates. However, the greater stiffness of proximal pads conveys a superior ability to push. Proximal pads of males were less direction dependent than distal pads and generated larger pushing forces in the distal and lateral directions. In females, proximal pads also produced higher friction forces than distal pads, but only in the lateral direction. Video recordings of vertically climbing beetles confirmed that each pad was used differently. When legs above the body centre of gravity were pulling, beetles mainly engaged the distal pads, whereas legs below the centre of gravity mainly pushed with the proximal pads. Attachment performance was additionally compared between sexes on different substrates. Our findings demonstrate the presence of sex-specific specialisations of the fibrillar system as well as a division of labour between different adhesive pads on the same tarsus.

Key words: adhesion, biomechanics, locomotion, tribology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

HOW CLIMBING LEAF BEETLES HANG ON
Kathryn Knight
JEB 2009 212: i. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. Knight
HOW CLIMBING LEAF BEETLES HANG ON
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2009; 212(12): i - i.
[Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009