QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online May 15, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 1620-1629 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.031534

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Harvey, W. R. PubMed Articles by Harvey, W. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Review Article

Voltage coupling of primary H⁺ V-ATPases to secondary Na⁺- or K⁺-dependent transporters

William R. Harvey

Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, University of Florida, 9505 Ocean Shore Boulevard, St Augustine, FL 32080, USA and Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, and Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA

e-mail: wharvey{at}whitney.ufl.edu

Accepted 7 April 2009

This review provides alternatives to two well established theories regarding membrane energization by H⁺ V-ATPases. Firstly, we offer an alternative to the notion that the H⁺ V-ATPase establishes a protonmotive force (pmf) across the membrane into which it is inserted. The term pmf, which was introduced by Peter Mitchell in 1961 in his chemiosmotic hypothesis for the synthesis of ATP by H⁺ F-ATP synthases, has two parts, the electrical potential difference across the phosphorylating membrane, , and the pH difference between the bulk solutions on either side of the membrane, pH. The pH term implies three phases – a bulk fluid phase on the H⁺ input side, the membrane phase and a bulk fluid phase on the H⁺ output side. The Mitchell theory was applied to H⁺ V-ATPases largely by analogy with H⁺ F-ATP synthases operating in reverse as H⁺ F-ATPases. We suggest an alternative, voltage coupling model. Our model for V-ATPases is based on Douglas B. Kell's 1979 `electrodic view' of ATP synthases in which two phases are added to the Mitchell model – an unstirred layer on the input side and another one on the output side of the membrane. In addition, we replace the notion that H<sup>+</sup> V-ATPases normally acidify the output bulk solution with the hypothesis, which we introduced in 1992, that the primary action of a H<sup>+</sup> V-ATPase is to charge the membrane capacitance and impose a across the membrane; the translocated hydrogen ions (H<sup>+</sup>s) are retained at the outer fluid–membrane interface by electrostatic attraction to the anions that were left behind. All subsequent events, including establishing pH differences in the outside bulk solution, are secondary. Using the surface of an electrode as a model, Kell's `electrodic view' has five phases – the outer bulk fluid phase, an outer fluid–membrane interface, the membrane phase, an inner fluid–membrane interface and the inner bulk fluid phase. Light flash, H⁺ releasing and binding experiments and other evidence provide convincing support for Kell's electrodic view yet Mitchell's chemiosmotic theory is the one that is accepted by most bioenergetics experts today. First we discuss the interaction between H⁺ V-ATPase and the K⁺/2H⁺ antiporter that forms the caterpillar K⁺ pump, and use the Kell electrodic view to explain how the H⁺s at the outer fluid–membrane interface can drive two H⁺ from lumen to cell and one K⁺ from cell to lumen via the antiporter even though the pH in the bulk fluid of the lumen is highly alkaline. Exchange of outer bulk fluid K⁺ (or Na⁺) with outer interface H⁺ in conjunction with (K⁺ or Na⁺)/2H⁺ antiport, transforms the hydrogen ion electrochemical potential difference, , to a K⁺ electrochemical potential difference, or a Na⁺ electrochemical potential difference, . The or drives K⁺- or Na⁺-coupled nutrient amino acid transporters (NATs), such as KAAT1 (K⁺ amino acid transporter 1), which moves Na⁺ and an amino acid into the cell with no H⁺s involved. Examples in which the voltage coupling model is used to interpret ion and amino acid transport in caterpillar and larval mosquito midgut are discussed.

Key words: electrogenic, electrophoretic, protonmotive force, electrochemical potential

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

SOLUTE TRANSPORTERS AND ACID–BASE REGULATION

Kathryn Knight
JEB 2009 212: i. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Padan, L. Kozachkov, K. Herz, and A. Rimon NhaA crystal structure: functional-structural insights J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2009; 212(11): 1593 - 1603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Linser, K. E. Smith, T. J. Seron, and M. Neira Oviedo Carbonic anhydrases and anion transport in mosquito midgut pH regulation J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2009; 212(11): 1662 - 1671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]