spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online December 16, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 95-105 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.016428
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vanella, M.
Right arrow Articles by Balachandran, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vanella, M.
Right arrow Articles by Balachandran, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing

Marcos Vanella, Timothy Fitzgerald, Sergio Preidikman, Elias Balaras and Balakumar Balachandran*

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: balab{at}umd.edu)

Accepted 21 October 2008

In the present study, a computational investigation was carried out to understand the influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing. A flexible, two-dimensional, two-link model moving within a viscous fluid was considered. The Navier–Stokes equations governing the fluid dynamics were solved together with the equations governing the structural dynamics by using a strongly coupled fluid–structure interaction scheme. Harmonic kinematics was used to prescribe the motions of one of the links, thus effectively reducing the wing to a single degree-of-freedom oscillator. The wing's flexibility was characterized by the ratio of the flapping frequency to the natural frequency of the structure. Apart from the rigid case, different values of this frequency ratio (only in the range of 1/2 to 1/6) were considered at the Reynolds numbers of 75, 250 and 1000. It was found that flexibility can enhance aerodynamic performance and that the best performance is realized when the wing is excited by a non-linear resonance at 1/3 of the natural frequency. Specifically, at Reynolds numbers of 75, 250 and 1000, the aerodynamic performance that is characterized by the ratio of lift coefficient to drag coefficient is respectively increased by 28%, 23% and 21% when compared with the corresponding ratios of a rigid wing driven with the same kinematics. For all Reynolds numbers, the lift generated per unit driving power is also enhanced in a similar manner. The wake capture mechanism is enhanced, due to a stronger flow around the wing at stroke reversal, resulting from a stronger end of stroke vortex at the trailing edge. The present study provides some clues about how flexibility affects the aerodynamic performance in low Reynolds number flapping flight. In addition, it points to the importance of considering non-linear resonances for enhancing aerodynamic performance.

Key words: flapping wing, fluid–structure interactions, finite-difference method, wing flexibility, non-linear resonance, low Reynolds numbers


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. Ishihara, Y. Yamashita, T. Horie, S. Yoshida, and T. Niho
Passive maintenance of high angle of attack and its lift generation during flapping translation in crane fly wing
J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2009; 212(23): 3882 - 3891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
L. A. Miller and C. S. Peskin
Flexible clap and fling in tiny insect flight
J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2009; 212(19): 3076 - 3090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. Young, S. M. Walker, R. J. Bomphrey, G. K. Taylor, and A. L. R. Thomas
Details of Insect Wing Design and Deformation Enhance Aerodynamic Function and Flight Efficiency
Science, September 18, 2009; 325(5947): 1549 - 1552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009