QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online December 16, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 32-41 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.017277

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sawicki, G. S. Articles by Ferris, D. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sawicki, G. S. Articles by Ferris, D. P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Mechanics and energetics of incline walking with robotic ankle exoskeletons

Gregory S. Sawicki^* and Daniel P. Ferris

Human Neuromechanics Laboratory, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: gsawicki{at}brown.edu)

Accepted 24 October 2008

We examined healthy human subjects wearing robotic ankle exoskeletons to study the metabolic cost of ankle muscle–tendon work during uphill walking. The exoskeletons were powered by artificial pneumatic muscles and controlled by the user's soleus electromyography. We hypothesized that as the demand for net positive external mechanical work increased with surface gradient, the positive work delivered by ankle exoskeletons would produce greater reductions in users' metabolic cost. Nine human subjects walked at 1.25 m s^–1 on gradients of 0%, 5%, 10% and 15%. We compared rates of O₂ consumption and CO₂ production, exoskeleton mechanics, joint kinematics, and surface electromyography between unpowered and powered exoskeleton conditions. On steeper inclines, ankle exoskeletons delivered more average positive mechanical power (P<0.0001; +0.37±0.03 W kg^–1 at 15% grade and +0.23±0.02 W kg^–1 at 0% grade) and reduced subjects' net metabolic power by more (P<0.0001; –0.98±0.12 W kg^–1 at 15% grade and –0.45±0.07 W kg^–1 at 0% grade). Soleus muscle activity was reduced by 16–25% when wearing powered exoskeletons on all surface gradients (P<0.0008). The `apparent efficiency' of ankle muscle–tendon mechanical work decreased from 0.53 on level ground to 0.38 on 15% grade. This suggests a decreased contribution from previously stored Achilles' tendon elastic energy and an increased contribution from actively shortening ankle plantar flexor muscle fibers to ankle muscle–tendon positive work during walking on steep uphill inclines. Although exoskeletons delivered 61% more mechanical work at the ankle up a 15% grade compared with level walking, relative reductions in net metabolic power were similar across surface gradients (10–13%). These results suggest a shift in the relative distribution of mechanical power output to more proximal (knee and hip) joints during inclined walking.

Key words: locomotion, uphill walking, incline, metabolic cost, exoskeleton, ankle, human, efficiency

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. T. Moritz A spring in your step: some is good, more is not always better J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2009; 107(3): 643 - 644. [Full Text] [PDF]