QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online April 18, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1504-1511 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.016196

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Horodysky, A. Z. Articles by Latour, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Horodysky, A. Z. Articles by Latour, R. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Acoustic pressure and particle motion thresholds in six sciaenid fishes

Andrij Z. Horodysky^1,*, Richard W. Brill², Michael L. Fine³, John A. Musick¹ and Robert J. Latour¹

¹ Department of Fisheries Science, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, VA 23062, USA
² Cooperative Marine Education and Research Program, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, Woods Hole, MA, USA
³ Department of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: andrij{at}vims.edu)

Accepted 5 March 2008

Sciaenid fishes are important models of fish sound production, but investigations into their auditory abilities are limited to acoustic pressure measurements on five species. In this study, we used auditory brainstem response (ABR) to assess the pressure and particle acceleration thresholds of six sciaenid fishes commonly found in Chesapeake Bay, eastern USA: weakfish (Cynoscion regalis), spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus), Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus), red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus), spot (Leiostomus xanthurus) and northern kingfish (Menticirrhus saxatilis). Experimental subjects were presented with pure 10 ms tone bursts in 100 Hz steps from 100 Hz to 1.2 kHz using an airborne speaker. Sound stimuli, monitored with a hydrophone and geophone, contained both pressure and particle motion components. Sound pressure and particle acceleration thresholds varied significantly among species and between frequencies; audiograms were notably flatter for acceleration than pressure at low frequencies. Thresholds of species with diverticulae projecting anteriorly from their swim bladders (weakfish, spotted seatrout, and Atlantic croaker) were typically but not significantly lower than those of species lacking such projections (red drum, spot, northern kingfish). Sciaenids were most sensitive at low frequencies that overlap the peak frequencies of their vocalizations. Auditory thresholds of these species were used to estimate idealized propagation distances of sciaenid vocalizations in coastal and estuarine environments.

Key words: animal communication, hearing, particle acceleration, particle velocity, Sciaenidae, soniferous

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Z. Horodysky, R. W. Brill, E. J. Warrant, J. A. Musick, and R. J. Latour Comparative visual function in five sciaenid fishes inhabiting Chesapeake Bay J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2008; 211(22): 3601 - 3612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]