spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online March 28, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1203-1210 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.012963
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Visual sensitivity to a conspicuous male cue varies by reproductive state in Physalaemus pustulosus females

Molly E. Cummings1,*, Ximena E. Bernal1, Roberto Reynaga1, A. Stanley Rand2 and Michael J. Ryan1,2

1 Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA
2 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 2072, Balboa, Panama

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: mcummings{at}mail.utexas.edu)

Accepted 4 February 2008

The vocal sac is a visually conspicuous attribute of most male frogs, but its role in visual communication has only been demonstrated recently in diurnally displaying frogs. Here we characterized the spectral properties of the inflated vocal sac of male túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus), a nocturnal species, and túngara visual sensitivity to this cue across reproductive state and sex. We measured the spectral and total reflectance of different male body regions, including inflated and non-inflated vocal sacs, along with samples of the visual background against which males are perceived. Inflated vocal sacs were the most reflective of all body parts, being one log unit more reflective than background materials. We utilized an optomotor drum with black stripes and stripes that mimicked the spectral reflectance of the inflated vocal sacs with various nocturnal light intensities to measure the visual sensitivity thresholds of males, non-reproductive females and reproductive females. All three groups exhibited visual sensitivities corresponding to intensities below moonless conditions in open habitats or at the edge of secondary tropical forests. Reproductive females exhibited the greatest visual sensitivity of all groups, and were significantly more sensitive than non-reproductive females. Though the mechanism for this physiological difference between reproductive and non-reproductive females is unknown, it is consistent with previously observed patterns of light-dependent phonotaxic behavior in túngaras. We suggest that the visual ecology of the vocal sac, especially in nocturnal frogs, offers a rich source for investigations of visual ecology and physiological regulation of vision.

Key words: visual sensitivity, reproductive status, visual cue, túngara frog, nocturnal vision, vocal sac


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
D. Gomez, C. Richardson, T. Lengagne, S. Plenet, P. Joly, J.-P. Lena, and M. Thery
The role of nocturnal vision in mate choice: females prefer conspicuous males in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea)
Proc R Soc B, July 7, 2009; 276(1666): 2351 - 2358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008