QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online March 14, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1120-1130 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.010413

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Berg, A. M. Articles by Biewener, A. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Berg, A. M. Articles by Biewener, A. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Kinematics and power requirements of ascending and descending flight in the pigeon (Columba livia)

Angela M. Berg^* and Andrew A. Biewener

Harvard University, Concord Field Station, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, 100 Old Causeway Road, Bedford, MA 01730, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: amberg{at}fas.harvard.edu)

Accepted 4 February 2008

Ascending or descending locomotion involves a change in potential energy (PE) and a corresponding change in power requirement. We sought to test whether the mechanical power required for steady ascending or descending flight is a simple sum of the power required for level flight and the power necessary for potential energy change. Pigeons (Columba livia) were trained to fly at varying angles of ascent and descent (60°, 30°, 0°, –30°, –60°), and were recorded using high-speed video. Detailed three-dimensional kinematics were obtained from the recordings, allowing analysis of wing movement. Aerodynamic forces and power requirements were then estimated from kinematic data. As expected, `PE flight power' increased significantly with angle of flight (0.234 W deg.^–1), though there appeared to be a limit on the amount of PE that the birds could gain or dissipate per wingbeat. We found that the total power output for flight at various angles was not different from the sum of power required for level flight and the PE rate of change for a given angle, except for the steep –60° descent. The total power for steep descent was higher than this sum because of a higher induced power due to the bird's deceleration and slower flight velocity. Aerodynamic force estimates during mid-downstroke did not differ significantly in magnitude or orientation among flight angles. Pigeons flew fastest during –30° flights (4.9±0.1 m s^–1) and slowest at 60° (2.9±0.1 m s^–1). Although wingbeat frequency ranged from 6.1 to 9.6 Hz across trials, the variation was not significant across flight angles. Stroke plane angle was more horizontal, and the wing more protracted, for both +60° and –60° flights, compared with other flight path angles.

Key words: flight, incline, kinematics, pigeon, power

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. K. Riskin, J. W. Bahlman, T. Y. Hubel, J. M. Ratcliffe, T. H. Kunz, and S. M. Swartz Bats go head-under-heels: the biomechanics of landing on a ceiling J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2009; 212(7): 945 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Swartz, K. S. Breuer, and D. J. Willis Aeromechanics in aeroecology: flight biology in the aerosphere Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 48(1): 85 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]