QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online February 29, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1012-1020 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.014795

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Salazar, V. L. Articles by Stoddard, P. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Salazar, V. L. Articles by Stoddard, P. K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Sex differences in energetic costs explain sexual dimorphism in the circadian rhythm modulation of the electrocommunication signal of the gymnotiform fish Brachyhypopomus pinnicaudatus

Vielka L. Salazar^* and Philip K. Stoddard

Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, University Park, Miami, FL 33199, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: vsalaz01{at}fiu.edu)

Accepted 12 January 2008

To understand the evolution of sexually dimorphic communication signals, we must quantify their costs, including their energetic costs, the regulation of these costs, and the difference between the costs for the sexes. Here, we provide the first direct measurements of the relative energy expended on electric signals and show for the focal species Brachyhypopomus pinnicaudatus that males spend a significantly greater proportion of their total energy budget on signal generation (11–22%) compared with females (3%). Both sexes significantly reduce the energy spent on electric signals during daylight hours through circadian modulation of the amplitude, duration and repetition rate of the electric signal, but this effect is more marked in males. Male body condition predicted the energy spent on electric signals (R²=0.75). The oxygen consumed by males for signal production closely paralleled the product of the electric signal's waveform area (R²=0.99) and the discharge rate (R²=0.59), two signal parameters that can be assessed directly by conspecifics. Thus the electric communication signal of males carries the information to reveal their body condition to prospective mates and competing males. Because the electric signal constitutes a significant fraction of the energy budget, energy savings, along with predation avoidance, provides an adaptive basis for the production of circadian rhythms in electric signals.

Key words: gymnotiform, sexual dimorphism, circadian rhythm, electric fish, electric organ discharge, energetic cost, communication signal

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

FISH'S EXPENSIVE ELECTRIC SERENADE

Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2008 211: i. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Phillips FISH'S EXPENSIVE ELECTRIC SERENADE J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2008; 211(6): i - ii. [Full Text] [PDF]