spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Online submission spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online February 15, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 773-779 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.009795
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hofmann, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkens, L. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hofmann, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkens, L. A.

Response properties of electrosensory units in the midbrain tectum of the paddlefish (Polyodon spathula Walbaum)

M. H. Hofmann1,2,*, S. N. Jung2, U. Siebenaller2, M. Preißner2, B. P. Chagnaud1 and L. A. Wilkens1

1 Center for Neurodynamics, Department of Biology, University of Missouri – St Louis, St Louis, MO 63121, USA
2 Institute of Zoology, University of Bonn, Poppelsdorfer Schloss, 53115 Bonn, Germany

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: hofmannm{at}umsl.edu)

Accepted 9 January 2008

Paddlefish use their peculiar rostrum to detect minute electric fields from their main prey, small water fleas. Electroreceptors over the rostrum and head sense these fields and send the information into a single hindbrain area, the dorsal octavolateral nucleus (DON). From there, information is sent to various midbrain structures, including the tectum. The response properties of primary afferent fibers and DON units has been well investigated, but nothing is known about electrosensory units in the midbrain. Here we recorded the responses of single units in the midbrain tectum and DON to uniform electric fields. Tectal units exhibited little spontaneous activity and responded to sine waves with a few, well phase-locked spikes. Phase locking was still significant at amplitudes one order of magnitude lower than in the DON. If stimulated with sinusoidal electric fields of different frequencies, phase locking in DON units decreased proportionally with frequency whereas the response of tectal units depended little on frequency. This is in agreement with behavioral studies showing that relevant frequencies range from DC to ca 20 Hz.

Key words: electroreception, paddlefish, mesencephalic tectum, single unit






© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008